{"id":79188,"date":"2024-10-17T18:32:02","date_gmt":"2024-10-17T18:32:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/uncategorized\/asme-vv-10-1-2012\/"},"modified":"2024-10-24T19:39:21","modified_gmt":"2024-10-24T19:39:21","slug":"asme-vv-10-1-2012","status":"publish","type":"product","link":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/publishers\/asme\/asme-vv-10-1-2012\/","title":{"rendered":"ASME VV 10.1 2012"},"content":{"rendered":"
The purpose of this document is to illustrate, by detailed example, the most important aspects of verification and validation (V&V) described in the Committee<\/p>\n
PDF Pages<\/th>\n | PDF Title<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6<\/td>\n | FOREWORD <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
7<\/td>\n | COMMITTEE ROSTER <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
8<\/td>\n | CORRESPONDENCE WITH THE V&V COMMITTEE <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
9<\/td>\n | 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 INTRODUCTION <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
10<\/td>\n | 3 PURPOSE AND SCOPE 4 BACKGROUND <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
11<\/td>\n | Figures \n Fig. 1 V&V Activities and Products <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
12<\/td>\n | Fig. 2 Validation Hierarchy Illustration for an Aircraft Wing <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
13<\/td>\n | 5 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION PLAN <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
14<\/td>\n | Fig. 3 Schematic of the Hollow Tapered Cantilever Beam <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
15<\/td>\n | Fig. 4 Estimating a Probability Density Function From an Uncertainty Estimate, \u0394 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
16<\/td>\n | Illustration of the Two Validation Approaches Fig. 6 Illustration of the Basis of the Area Metric <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
17<\/td>\n | 6 MODEL DEVELOPMENT <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
18<\/td>\n | 7 VERIFICATION <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
19<\/td>\n | Tables Table 1 Normalized Deflections <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
20<\/td>\n | Fig. 7 Errors in Normalized Deflections <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
21<\/td>\n | Table 2 Numerical Solutions for Tip Deflections <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
22<\/td>\n | 8 VALIDATION APPROACH 1 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
23<\/td>\n | 9 VALIDATION APPROACH 2 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
24<\/td>\n | Fig. 8 Area Between the Experimental and Computed CDF Fig. 9 Empirical CDF of the Validation Experiment Data Table 3 Measured Beam-Tip Deflections From the Validation Experiments <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
25<\/td>\n | Table 4 Test Measurements of the Modulus of Elasticity, E <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
26<\/td>\n | Fig. 10 Random Variability in Modulus, E, Used in the Computational Model Table 5 Test Estimates of the Support Flexibility <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
27<\/td>\n | Fig. 11 Random Variability in Support Flexibility, fr , Used in the Computational Model <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
28<\/td>\n | Fig. 12 Input Uncertainty Propagation Process Fig. 13 Computed CDF of Beam Tip Deflection <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
29<\/td>\n | 10 SUMMARY 11 CONCLUDING REMARKS Fig. 14 CDF of the Model-Predicted Tip Deflection, Empirical CDF of the Validation Experiment Tip Deflections,and Area Between Them (Shaded Region) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
30<\/td>\n | 12 REFERENCES <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" ASME V V 10.1 An Illustration of the Concepts of Verification and Validation in Computational Solid Mechanics<\/b><\/p>\n |