BS EN 12150-1:2015
$167.15
Glass in building. Thermally toughened soda lime silicate safety glass – Definition and description
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
BSI | 2015 | 42 |
This European Standard specifies tolerances, flatness, edgework, fragmentation and physical and mechanical characteristics of monolithic flat thermally toughened soda lime silicate safety glass for use in buildings. Information on curved thermally toughened soda lime silicate safety glass is given in Annex A, but this product does not form part of this European Standard. Other requirements, not specified in this European Standard, can apply to thermally toughened soda lime silicate safety glass which is incorporated into assemblies, e.g. laminated glass or insulating glass units, or undergo an additional treatment, e.g. coating. The additional requirements are specified in the appropriate glass product standard. Thermally toughened soda lime silicate safety glass, in this case, does not lose its bending strength characteristics and its resistance to temperature differentials. Surface finished glasses (e.g. sandblasted, acid etched) after toughening are not covered by this European Standard.
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
4 | Contents Page |
6 | European foreword |
7 | Introduction |
8 | 1 Scope 2 Normative references 3 Terms and definitions |
10 | 4 Glass products 5 Fracture characteristics |
11 | 6 Dimensions and tolerances 6.1 Nominal thickness and thickness tolerances Table 1 — Nominal thicknesses and thickness tolerances 6.2 Width and length (sizes) 6.2.1 General |
12 | Figure 1 — Examples of width, B, and length, H, relative to the pane shape 6.2.2 Maximum and minimum sizes 6.2.3 Tolerances and squareness Table 2 — Tolerances on width, B, and length, H Table 3 — Limit deviations for the difference between diagonals |
13 | 6.2.4 Edge deformation produced by the vertical process Figure 2 — Tong mark deformation 6.3 Flatness 6.3.1 General |
14 | Figure 3 — Representation of overall bow Figure 4 — Representation of roller wave distortion |
15 | Figure 5 — Representation of edge lift Figure 6 — Representation of local distortion 6.3.2 Measurement of overall bow |
16 | Figure 7 — Support conditions for the measurement of overall bow 6.3.3 Measurement of wave and roller wave 6.3.3.1 General 6.3.3.2 Apparatus |
17 | 6.3.3.3 Method 6.3.3.4 Limitations Figure 8 — Measurement of wave or roller wave distortion 6.3.4 Measurement of edge lift (for horizontally toughened glass only) |
18 | Figure 9 — Measurement of edge lift 6.3.5 Measurement of perimeter deformation of glass produced by air cushion toughening process Figure 10 — Measurement of perimeter deformation |
19 | 6.3.6 Measurement of local distortion (for vertically toughened glass only) Figure 11 — Measurement of local distortion 6.3.7 Limitation on overall bow, roller waves and edge lift for horizontally toughened glass |
20 | Table 4 — Maximum allowable values of overall bow and roller wave distortion for horizontally toughened glass Table 5 — Maximum allowable values for edge lift for horizontal toughening 6.3.8 Limitation on overall bow, wave and perimeter deformation for toughened glass manufactured by air cushion process |
21 | Table 6 — Maximum allowable values of overall bow and wave distortion for toughened glass manufactured by air cushion process Table 7 — Maximum allowable values for perimeter deformation for toughened glass manufactured by air cushion process 6.3.9 Limitation on overall bow and local distortion for vertically toughened glass Table 8 — Maximum allowable values of overall bow and local distortion for vertical toughened glass 6.3.10 Other distortions |
22 | 7 Edge and/or surface work, holes, notches and cut-outs 7.1 Warning 7.2 Edge working of glass for toughening Figure 12 — Arrissed edge (with blank spots) Figure 13 — Ground edge (with blank spots) Figure 14 — Smooth ground edge (no blank spots) |
23 | Figure 15 — Polished edge 7.3 Profiled edges 7.4 Round holes 7.4.1 General 7.4.2 Diameter of holes 7.4.3 Limitations on position of holes Figure 16 — Relationship between hole and edge of pane |
24 | Figure 17 — Relationship between two holes Figure 18 — Relationship between hole and corner of pane 7.4.4 Tolerances on hole diameters Table 9 — Tolerances on hole diameters |
25 | 7.4.5 Tolerances on position of holes Figure 19 — Examples of the positioning of holes relative to the datum point 7.5 Holes/others |
26 | Figure 20 — Countersunk hole 7.6 Notches and cut-outs Figure 21 — Examples of notches and cut-outs 7.7 Shaped panes 8 Fragmentation test 8.1 General 8.2 Dimensions and number of test specimens 8.3 Test procedure |
27 | Figure 22 — Position of impact point 8.4 Assessment of fragmentation |
28 | Figure 23 — Area to be excluded from the particle count determination and largest particle measurement Figure 24 — Examples of crack-free particles and the assessment regarding the number 8.5 Minimum values from the particle count |
29 | Table 10 — Minimum particle count values 8.6 Selection of the longest particle 8.7 Maximum length of longest particle 9 Other physical characteristics 9.1 Optical distortion 9.1.1 Thermally toughened soda lime silicate safety glass produced by vertical toughening 9.1.2 Thermally toughened soda lime silicate safety glass produced by horizontal toughening 9.2 Anisotropy (iridescence) 9.3 Thermal durability |
30 | 9.4 Mechanical strength Table 11 — Minimum values for the mechanical strength of thermally toughened soda lime silicate safety glass 9.5 Classification of performance under accidental human impact 10 Marking |
32 | Annex A (informative) Curved thermally toughened soda lime silicate safety glass |
33 | Annex B (informative) Alternative method for the measurement of roller wave distortion B.1 Apparatus Figure B.1 — Roller wave measurement apparatus B.2 Method Figure B.2 — Place the apparatus across the roller wave Figure B.3 — Set the zero of the gauge on a peak of the roller wave |
34 | Figure B.4 — Move the gauge to a trough B.3 Limitations B.4 Alternative use of apparatus |
35 | Annex C (informative) Examples of particle count Figure C.1 — Example of selecting the area of coarsest fracture |
36 | Figure C.2 — Example of marking and counting |
37 | Figure C.3 — Example for marking and counting of overall particle count for the specimen |
38 | Annex D (informative) Risk of spontaneous breakage of toughened glass due to nickel sulfide inclusion |
39 | Bibliography |