BS EN 62209-2:2010
$215.11
Human exposure to radio frequency fields from hand-held and bodymounted wireless communication devices. Human models, instrumentation, and procedures – Procedure to determine the specific absorption rate (SAR) for wireless communication devices used in close proximity to the human body (frequency range of 30 MHz to 6 GHz)
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
BSI | 2010 | 118 |
IEC 62209-2:2010 is applicable to any wireless communication device capable of transmitting electromagnetic fields (EMF) intended to be used at a position near the human body, in the manner described by the manufacturer, with the radiating part(s) of the device at distances up to and including 200 mm from a human body, i.e. when held in the hand or in front of the face, mounted on the body, combined with other transmitting or non-transmitting devices or accessories (e.g. belt-clip, camera or Bluetooth add-on), or embedded in garments. For transmitters used in close proximity to the human ear, the procedures of IEC 62209-1:2005 are applicable. IEC 62209-2:2010 is applicable for radio frequency exposure in the frequency range of 30 MHz to 6 GHz, and may be used to measure simultaneous exposures from multiple radio sources used in close proximity to human body. Definitions and evaluation procedures are provided for the following general categories of device types: – body-mounted, – body-supported, – desktop, – front-of-face, – hand-held, – laptop, – limb-mounted, – multi-band, – push-to-talk, – clothing-integrated. The types of devices considered include but are not limited to mobile telephones, cordless microphones, auxiliary broadcast devices and radio transmitters in personal computers. IEC 62209-2:2010 gives guidelines for a reproducible and conservative measurement methodology for determining the compliance of wireless devices with the SAR limits. The contents of the corrigendum of June 2010 have been included in this copy.
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
6 | English CONTENTS |
9 | FOREWORD |
11 | INTRODUCTION |
12 | 1 Scope 2 Normative references |
13 | 3 Terms and definitions |
16 | 4 Symbols and abbreviated terms 4.1 Physical quantities 4.2 Constants 4.3 Abbreviations |
17 | 5 Measurement system specifications 5.1 General requirements |
18 | 5.2 Phantom specifications – shell and liquid |
19 | Figures Figure 1 – Dimensions of the elliptical phantom |
20 | Tables Table 1 – Dielectric properties of the tissue-equivalent liquid material |
21 | 5.3 Measurement instrumentation system specifications |
22 | 6 Protocol for SAR evaluation 6.1 Measurement preparation |
25 | Figure 2 – Definition of reference points |
26 | Figure 3 – Measurements by shifting of the device at the phantom |
27 | Figure 4 – Test positions for a generic device |
28 | Figure 5 – Test positions for body-worn devices Figure 6 – Device with swivel antenna (example of desktop device) |
30 | Figure 7 – Test positions for body supported devices |
31 | Figure 8 – Test positions for desktop devices |
32 | Figure 9 – Test positions for front-of-face devices |
33 | Figure 10 – Test position for limb-worn devices |
34 | 6.2 Tests to be performed Figure 11 – Test position for clothing-integrated wireless devices |
37 | Figure 12 – Block diagram of the tests to be performed |
38 | 6.3 Measurement procedure |
39 | Figure 13 – Orientation of the probe with respect to the normal of the phantom surface |
41 | 6.4 Post-processing |
42 | 7 Uncertainty estimation 7.1 General considerations |
44 | 7.2 Components contributing to uncertainty |
54 | Table 2 – Example uncertainty template and example numerical values for relative permittivity (ε′r ) and conductivity (σ) measurement; separate tables may be needed for each ε′r and σ |
58 | Table 3 – Parameters for reference function f1 |
59 | Table 4 – Reference SAR values in watts per kilogram used for estimating post-processing uncertainties |
62 | 7.3 Uncertainty estimation |
63 | Table 5 – Measurement uncertainty evaluation template for DUT SAR test |
65 | Table 6 – Measurement uncertainty evaluation template for system validation |
67 | Table 7 – Measurement uncertainty evaluation template for system repeatability |
68 | 8 Measurement report 8.1 General 8.2 Items to be recorded in the measurement report |
70 | Annex A (informative) Phantom rationale |
73 | Annex B (normative) SAR measurement system verification |
75 | Figure B.1 – Set-up for the system check |
80 | Table B.1 – Numerical reference SAR values for reference dipoles and flat phantom ( All values are normalized to a forward power of 1 W |
81 | Table B.2 – Numerical reference SAR values for reference matched waveguides in contact with flat phantom (from reference [53]) |
82 | Annex C (informative) Fast SAR testing |
84 | Annex D (informative) Standard sources and phantoms for system validation |
85 | Table D.1 – Mechanical dimensions of the reference dipoles |
86 | Figure D.1 – Mechanical details of the reference dipole |
87 | Figure D.2 – Dimensions of the flat phantom set-up used for deriving the minimal dimensions for W and L |
88 | Figure D.3 – FDTD predicted uncertainty in the 10 g peak spatial-average SAR as a function of the dimensions of the flat phantom compared with an infinite flat phantom Table D.2 – Parameters used for calculation of reference SAR values in Table B.1 |
89 | Figure D.4 – Standard waveguide source Table D.3 – Mechanical dimensions of the standard waveguide |
90 | Annex E (informative) Example recipes for phantom tissue-equivalent liquids |
91 | Table E.1 – Suggested recipes for achieving target dielectric parameters |
93 | Annex F (normative) SAR correction for deviations of complex permittivity from targets |
94 | Table F.1 – Root-mean-squared error of Equations (F.1) to (F.3) as a function of the maximum change in permittivity or conductivity [13] |
95 | Annex G (informative) Hands-free kit testing Figure G.1 – Configuration of a wired personal hands-free headset |
96 | Figure G.2 – Configuration without a wired personal hands-free headset |
98 | Annex H (informative) Skin enhancement factor Figure H.1 – SAR and temperature increase (ΔT) distributions simulated for a three-layer (skin, fat, muscle) planar torso model |
99 | Figure H.2 –Statistical approach to protect 90 % of the population |
100 | Figure H.3 – Spatial-average SAR skin enhancement factors Table H.1 – Spatial-average SAR correction factors |
102 | Annex I (informative) Tissue-equivalent liquid dielectric property measurements and measurement uncertainty estimation Table I.1 – Parameters for calculating the dielectric properties of various reference liquids |
103 | Table I.2 – Dielectric properties of reference liquids at 20 °C |
104 | Annex J (informative) Testing compliance for the exposure of the hand Figure J.1 – Test position for hand-held devices, not used at the head or torso |
106 | Annex K (informative) Test reduction |
108 | Annex L (normative) Power scaling procedure |
110 | Annex M (informative) Rationale for probe parameters Table M.1 – Minimum probe requirements as a function of frequency and parameters of the tissue equivalent liquid |
111 | Table M.2 – Extrapolation and integration uncertainty of the 10 g peak spatial average SAR (k=2) for homogeneous and graded meshes |
112 | Bibliography |