BS IEC SRD 62913-1:2019
$198.66
Generic smart grid requirements – Specific application of the Use Case methodology for defining generic smart grid requirements according to the IEC systems approach
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
BSI | 2019 | 62 |
IEC SRD 62913-1:2019 (E) describes a common approach for IEC technical committees to define generic smart grid requirements for further standardization work. It uses as input the Use Case methodology defined as part of the IEC 62559 series, and provides a more detailed methodology for describing Use Cases and extracting requirements from these Use Cases. This is necessary to achieve a consistent and homogeneous description of generic requirements for the different areas which make up the smart grid environment.
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
2 | undefined |
4 | CONTENTS |
7 | FOREWORD |
9 | INTRODUCTION |
10 | 1 Scope 2 Normative references 3 Terms, definitions and abbreviated terms 3.1 Terms and definitions |
14 | 3.2 Abbreviated terms Tables Table 1 – Differences between business and system Use Cases |
15 | 4 Systems approach 4.1 A systems perspective |
16 | 4.2 Applying the IEC systems approach to smart energy |
17 | 4.3 Main areas of work |
18 | 4.4 Breaking down the scope 4.5 Link with some existing conceptual models |
19 | 5 Specific application of Use Case methodology for defining generic smart grid requirements 5.1 General Table 2 – Links between SGAM and IEC SRD 62913 domains |
20 | 5.2 Why the Use Case methodology is particularly adapted to smart grid 5.2.1 General 5.2.2 Linking the Use Case methodology with existing frameworks |
21 | Figures Figure 1 – The GridWise Architecture Council’s Model (NIST, 2012) Figure 2 – Simplification of the GWAC model (CEN/CENELEC/ETSI, 2014) |
22 | Figure 3 – Smart grid plane domains and hierarchical zones |
23 | Figure 4 – The Smart Grid Architecture Model (CEN-CENELEC-ETSI, 2014) |
24 | 5.2.3 Notion of role Figure 5 – Interactions between the Use Case methodology and the Smart GridArchitecture Model (based on CEN-CENELEC-ETSI, 2014) |
25 | 5.3 Applying the Use Case methodology to define generic smart grid requirements 5.3.1 A business processes driven approach Figure 6 – Defining smart grid requirements methodology |
26 | Figure 7 – Point of view of a domain role |
27 | Figure 8 – The first two levels of detail used to capture genericsmart grid requirements |
28 | 5.3.2 Generic smart grid requirements Figure 9 – The levels of detail used to capture generic smart grid requirements |
30 | Figure 10 – Generic smart grid functional and non-functional requirementscaptured in Use Cases |
31 | 5.4 Proposed working principles for drafting and managing smart energy Use Cases and requirements 5.4.1 General 5.4.2 Governance policies |
32 | Figure 11 – Indicative interactions between SyC Smart Energy and smart energy TCsfor drafting Use Cases |
33 | 5.4.3 The Use Case Manager function |
34 | Table 3 – Reporting of a Technical Committee Use Cases roadmap |
35 | 5.4.4 Naming and harmonization of roles and actors 5.5 Approach used to elaborate a consolidated smart grid role model Table 4 – Reporting on roles used in a Technical Committee Use Case |
36 | Figure 12 – Example of representation of a domain’s role model |
37 | 6 UML profile for modelling smart grid Use Cases 6.1 A formal approach of Use Cases modelling 6.1.1 General 6.1.2 Key principles Figure 13 – Example of representation of relations between roles |
38 | 6.2 UML driven top-down approach methodology 6.2.1 Formalism and objectives 6.2.2 Modelling language |
39 | 6.2.3 Scope and information type classification: diagrams and main elements Figure 14 – Four-layer model architecture |
40 | 6.2.4 Key benefits |
42 | 6.2.5 Types of diagrams and views Figure 15 – UML Use Case profile for the IEC SRD 62913 seriesaligned with the IEC 62559 series |
43 | Figure 16 – Use Case overview diagram Figure 17 – Domain overview diagram |
44 | 6.3 IEC Use Cases UML profile concepts Figure 18 – BUC-SUC relations diagram |
45 | Table 5 – Use Cases concepts |
46 | 7 UML modelling diagrams Figure 19 – Mapping between Use Case concepts and architecture concepts |
47 | Figure 20 – Domain overview concepts UML model Figure 21 – Use Case overview concepts UML model |
48 | Figure 22 – Scenario overview concepts UML model |
49 | Figure 23 – Activity overview concepts UML model |
50 | Annex A (informative)Existing actors lists |
51 | Annex B (informative)Content of the Use Case mapped on IEC 62559-2 template B.1 Description of the use case B.1.1 Name of use case B.1.2 Version management B.1.3 Scope and objectives of use case B.1.4 Narrative of use case |
52 | B.1.5 Key performance indicators (KPI) B.1.6 Use case conditions B.1.7 Further information to the use case for classification / mapping B.1.8 General remarks B.2 Diagrams of use case |
53 | B.3 Technical details B.3.1 Actors B.3.2 References B.4 Step by step analysis of use case B.4.1 Overview of scenarios |
54 | B.4.2 Steps – Scenarios B.5 Information exchanged B.6 Requirements (optional) B.7 Common terms and definitions |
55 | B.8 Custom information (optional) B.9 IEC 62559-2 UML Modelling Figure B.1 – Use Case mapping to IEC 62559-2 |
56 | Figure B.2 – Use Case mapping to IEC 62559-2 – Scenario and activities |
57 | Annex C (informative)Example of telecommunication related non-functional requirement Table C.1 – Example of telecommunication related non-functional requirement |
58 | Annex D (informative)Existing smart grid conceptual models Figure D.1 – NIST/SGIP Smart Grid Conceptual Model Table D.1 – NIST/SGIP domains |
59 | Figure D.2 – M490 domains Table D.2 – SGAM domains |
60 | Bibliography |