BSI PD IEC/TR 62547:2013
$167.15
Guidelines for the measurement of high-power damage sensitivity ofsinglemode fibre to bends. Guidance for the interpretation of results
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
BSI | 2013 | 44 |
This technical report describes two methods for the measurement of the sensitivity of single – mode optical fibres to high-power damage at bends:
-
te st method 1 – Failure time characterisation as a function of the launch power and bend conditions (bend angle and bend diameter);
-
t est method 2 – Equilibrium temperature measurement .
Results from the two methods can only be compared qualitatively.
The results in this report are predominantly on un -cabled and un-buffered fibres. Cabled and buffered fibres are expected to respond differently , because the outer layers can affect the ageing process. Note also that test method 2 testing cannot be applied to buffered or cabled fibres.
These methods do not constitute a routine test to be used in the evaluation of optical fibre.
The parameters derived from the two methods are not intended to be specified within a detailed fibre specification.
The catastrophic failure modes arising and which are described in this document in general occur at bending radii much smaller than specified in the single -mode fibre specification IEC 60793-2-50 or than would be recommended based on mechanical reliability considerations alone.
This report includes several annexes, including a discussion on the rationale for the approaches adopted, metrics for assessment, guidance, examples and some conclusions from initial studies.
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
4 | CONTENTS |
6 | FOREWORD |
8 | 1 Scope 2 Normative references |
9 | 3 Background |
11 | 4 Test procedures 4.1 Safety 4.1.1 Safety issues 4.1.2 Eye safe working 4.1.3 Risk of fire/flame 4.1.4 Risk of atmospheric pollution from coating by-products 4.1.5 Risk of fibre fuse initiation |
12 | 4.1.6 Risk of damage to downstream components 4.1.7 Risk avoidance 4.2 General 4.3 Apparatus 4.3.1 Light source 4.3.2 Isolator |
13 | 4.3.3 Bend jig 4.3.4 Receiver 4.3.5 Attenuator 4.3.6 Computer 4.3.7 Camera 4.3.8 Thermal imaging camera 4.3.9 Oven Figures Figure 1 – Example of experimental layout |
14 | 4.3.10 Sample 4.4 Test method 1 – Failure time characterization as a function of the launch power and bend conditions (bend angle and diameter) 4.4.1 Description and procedure |
15 | 4.4.2 General comments and conclusions on test method 1 Figure 2 – Damage results for fibre ‘G’ |
16 | 4.4.3 Reported items for test method 1 4.5 Test method 2 – Equilibrium temperature measurement 4.5.1 General |
17 | Figure 3 –Example of time evolution of catastrophic high-power loss and related maximum temperature reached by the coating near to the top of the bent fibre (apex) |
18 | 4.5.2 Coating heating measurements and power lost at bend Figure 4 – Sample FLIR camera output of the fibre bent under high power Figure 5 – Dependence of the coating equilibrium temperature as a function of launched power and bend diameter for an IEC B1.2/ITU-T G.654 single-mode fibre (see reference [10]) |
19 | 4.5.3 Analysis – test method 2: equilibrium temperature |
20 | 4.5.4 Test conditions for test method 2 Figure 6a – Calculated from experimental test data at 1 360 nm Figure 6b – Extrapolated for 1 550 nm Figure 6c – Extrapolated for 1 625 nm Figure 6 – Maximum safe powers for 25 year life time as a function of bend radius enabling a safe coating temperature of ~80 °C for four single-mode fibre (sub-) categories |
21 | 4.5.5 Conclusions on test method 2 4.5.6 Reported items for test method 2 |
22 | 5 Conclusions |
23 | Annex A (informative) Robustness of fibres against damage fromexposure to high power at bends |
25 | Figure A.1 – Clamping arrangements for high-power damage testing in 180° bends Figure A.2 – Clamping arrangement for high-power damage testing in 90° bends |
26 | Figure A.3 – Typical R1 failure characteristics with a loss of greater than 10 dB Figure A.4 – Typical R2 failure characteristics Figure A.5 – A schematic illustration of the three regimes |
27 | Figure A.6 – Monitor signal changes – Typical for an R1 failure Figure A.7 – Monitor signal changes – Typical for an R2 failure |
28 | Figure A.8 – Damage results for fibre sample ‘D’ Figure A.9 – High-power damage results at 90° and 180° for fibre ‘D’ |
29 | Figure A.10 – Time to failure versus bend diameter at different launched powers |
30 | Figure A.11 – Bend loss performance at 180° (and 90° for comparison) for fibre ‘D’ Figure A.12 – Power limitation for primary coated fibre |
31 | Figure A.13 – Comparison of power limitation for primary and secondary coated fibre ‘D’ |
32 | Figure A.14 – Maximum optical power ensuring a 25 year lifetime and 180° bendloss versus bend diameter (from reference [10]) Figure A.15 – Maximum optical power ensuring a 25 year lifetime versus 180° bend loss |
34 | Figure A.16 – 180( 2-point OSA bend loss for fibre ‘D’ Figure A.17 – 180( 2-point bend loss at 1 480 nm for fibre ‘D’ |
35 | Figure A.18 – 2-point bend loss for fibre ‘D’ at various angles |
36 | Figure A.19 – 180( 2-point bend loss at 1 480 nm for a range of fibres |
37 | Figure A.20 – Time to failure versus inverse of equilibrium temperature using an IEC B1.2/ITU-T G.654 single-mode fibre for bend diameters varying from 4 mm to 10 mm and launched power in the range 0,8 W to 3,2 W Figure A.21 – Effect of baking primary coated fibre ‘C’ (reference [15]) in an oven at constant temperature |
39 | Figure A.22 – Time to failure for different coatings as a function of bend radius Tables Table A.1 – Dependence of high-power damage on power entering coating |
41 | Bibliography |