{"id":454354,"date":"2024-10-20T09:35:04","date_gmt":"2024-10-20T09:35:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/uncategorized\/bsi-pd-iec-tr-61000-1-92024\/"},"modified":"2024-10-26T17:47:30","modified_gmt":"2024-10-26T17:47:30","slug":"bsi-pd-iec-tr-61000-1-92024","status":"publish","type":"product","link":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/publishers\/bsi\/bsi-pd-iec-tr-61000-1-92024\/","title":{"rendered":"BSI PD IEC TR 61000-1-9:2024"},"content":{"rendered":"
PDF Pages<\/th>\n | PDF Title<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2<\/td>\n | undefined <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
4<\/td>\n | CONTENTS <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
5<\/td>\n | FOREWORD <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
7<\/td>\n | INTRODUCTION <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
8<\/td>\n | 1 Scope 2 Normative references <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
9<\/td>\n | 3 Terms and definitions 4 Uncertainty evaluation for harmonic emissions tests in IEC 61000-3-2 and IEC 61000-3-12 4.1 Methodology <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
10<\/td>\n | 4.2 Measurement model Figure 1 \u2013 Measurement circuit for single-phase equipment <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
11<\/td>\n | 4.3 Uncertainty components for worst-case scenario 4.3.1 Method 4.3.2 Current measurement equipment 4.3.3 Input impedance of the current measurement equipment <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
12<\/td>\n | 4.3.4 Test voltage RMS value 4.3.5 Harmonic distortion of the test voltage <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
13<\/td>\n | 4.3.6 Loading effect of the voltmeter 4.4 Uncertainty budget for Class A harmonic 5 Tables Table 1 \u2013 Worst-case uncertainty budget for Class A, Harmonic 5 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
14<\/td>\n | 5 Uncertainty budget for typical measurement data 5.1 General 5.2 Current measurement equipment <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
15<\/td>\n | 5.3 Input impedance of the measurement equipment 5.4 Test voltage RMS value <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
16<\/td>\n | 5.5 Harmonic distortion of the test voltage 5.6 Loading effect of the voltmeter <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
17<\/td>\n | 6 Measurement uncertainty supporting conformity decisions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
18<\/td>\n | Annex A (informative)Worst-case uncertainty budgets for various EUT classesof tests and selected harmonics Table A.1 \u2013 Worst-case uncertainty budget for Class A, Harmonic 5 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
19<\/td>\n | Table A.2 \u2013 Worst-case uncertainty budget for Class A, Harmonic 6 Table A.3 \u2013 Worst-case uncertainty budget for Class A, Harmonic15 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
20<\/td>\n | Table A.4 \u2013 Worst-case uncertainty budget for Class A, Harmonic 40 Table A.5 \u2013 Worst-case uncertainty budget for Class C, Harmonic 3 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
21<\/td>\n | Table A.6 \u2013 Worst-case uncertainty budget for Class C, Harmonic 5 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
22<\/td>\n | Table A.7 \u2013 Worst-case uncertainty budget for Class C, Harmonic 11 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
23<\/td>\n | Table A.8 \u2013 Worst-case uncertainty budget for Class D, Harmonic 3 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
24<\/td>\n | Table A.9 \u2013 Worst-case uncertainty budget for Class D, Harmonic 11 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
25<\/td>\n | Bibliography <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) – General. Evaluation of uncertainty for the measurement of harmonic current emissions<\/b><\/p>\n |