{"id":78776,"date":"2024-10-17T18:25:23","date_gmt":"2024-10-17T18:25:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/uncategorized\/asce-9780784410509-2009\/"},"modified":"2024-10-24T19:38:05","modified_gmt":"2024-10-24T19:38:05","slug":"asce-9780784410509-2009","status":"publish","type":"product","link":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/publishers\/asce\/asce-9780784410509-2009\/","title":{"rendered":"ASCE 9780784410509 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
This collection contains nearly 150 peer-reviewed papers presented at the 2009 Technical Council on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering (TCLEE) Conference, held in Oakland, CA, June 28-July 1, 2009.<\/p>\n
PDF Pages<\/th>\n | PDF Title<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1<\/td>\n | Cover <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
13<\/td>\n | Contents <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
26<\/td>\n | Bridges and Highway Systems: Seismic Design and Retrofit of Bridge Structures Seattle\u2019s Bridge Seismic Retrofit Program: Philosophy, Policies, and Criteria <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
38<\/td>\n | Performance Based Design of Seismic Isolated Bridges in Near-Fault Zones Using Elastic-Gap Devices <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
49<\/td>\n | Research on Rapidly Constructed CFT Bridge Piers Suitable for Seismic Design <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
60<\/td>\n | Seattle\u2019s Bridge Seismic Retrofit Program: Ballard Bridge Case Study <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
72<\/td>\n | Seismic Risk Analysis of Bridges and Highway Systems Fragility Curves for a Typical California Box Girder Bridge <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
84<\/td>\n | Risk- and Performance-Based Seismic Analysis for Long-Span Cable-Stayed Bridges <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
96<\/td>\n | Transportation System Modeling and Decision Support for Catastrophic Event Planning in the Central United States: A Case Study of St. Louis Area <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
104<\/td>\n | Uncertainties in Seismic Risk Assessment of Highway Transportation Systems <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
113<\/td>\n | Uncertainty Quantification in Analytical Bridge Fragility Curves <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
125<\/td>\n | Seismic Analysis of Bridges 1 A Study on the Earthquake Motion Determination Based on Microtremor Measurement along the Expressway <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
133<\/td>\n | Optimal Isolator Parameters for Economical Mitigation of Seismic Risk for Highway Bridges <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
145<\/td>\n | Pulse-Like Near-Fault Ground Motion Effects on the Ductility Requirement of Bridge Bents <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
157<\/td>\n | Seismic Behaviour of an Isolated Bridge with Directional Effects <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
166<\/td>\n | Seismic Analysis of Bridges 2 Risk-Based Rapid Visual Screening of Bridges <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
178<\/td>\n | Seismic Analysis and Design Optimization of a Self-Anchored Suspension Bridge <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
190<\/td>\n | The Response of Long-Span Bridges to Low Frequency, Near-Fault Earthquake Ground Motions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
202<\/td>\n | Utilization of Seismic Response Measurement for Damage Detection and Capacity Estimation of Bridges <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
210<\/td>\n | Electric Power: Electric Power 1 \u2014Equipment Breaking Strength of Porcelain Insulator Sections Subjected to Cyclic Loading <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
222<\/td>\n | Development of a Damage Estimation System for Electric Power Distribution Equipment Using the Bayesian Network <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
234<\/td>\n | Evaluation of Hollow Core Composite Insulators <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
246<\/td>\n | Seismic Evaluation and Protection of High Voltage Disconnect Switches <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
257<\/td>\n | Seismic Vulnerabilities and Retrofit of High-Voltage Electrical Substation Facilities <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
269<\/td>\n | Seismic Performance of Electrical Substations\u2019 Equipment in Bam Earthquake (Iran 2003) <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
277<\/td>\n | Electric Power 2\u2014Power System Design and Qualification Standards A Seismic Risk Management Model for Electric Power Distribution Networks in Large Cities by Concentration on Low-Voltage Substations <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
287<\/td>\n | ASCE Guide for Design of Substation Structures <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
299<\/td>\n | Earthquake Performance of High Voltage Electric Components and New Standards for Seismic Qualification <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
310<\/td>\n | Proposed Change to IEEE Qualification of Transformers and Their Bushings <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
321<\/td>\n | Seismic Design Standards for Electric Substation Equipment <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
333<\/td>\n | Electric Power 3\u2014Power Transmission Towers Life-Cycle Cost Functions for Electrical Substations and Power Transmission Towers under Strong Winds in Mexico <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
345<\/td>\n | Multi-Hazard Analysis of Electric Power Delivery Systems <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
352<\/td>\n | Seismic Assessment of Electric Power Transmission Concrete Beams <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
360<\/td>\n | Transmission Tower Seismic Risk Mitigation for British Columbia <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
372<\/td>\n | Gas and Liquid Fuels: Gas and Liquid Fuels A Verification Study of ASCE Recommended Guidelines for Seismic Evaluation and Design of \u201cOn Pipe-Way Piping\u201d\u009d in Petrochemical Plants <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
382<\/td>\n | Missing Factors in Seismic Safety Evaluation of Petrochemical Facilities by Practicing Engineers <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
390<\/td>\n | Seismic Issues Finally Addressed in Federal Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Regulations <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
397<\/td>\n | Simulation of Sloshing Effects in Cylindrical Tanks and Evaluation of Seismic Performance <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
407<\/td>\n | Strain in Pipe Elbows Due to Wave Propagation Hazards <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
418<\/td>\n | Lifeline Research and Performance: Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering for Lifelines Ground Motion Selection and Modification: An Overview of Recent Progress for Building Structures and the Implications for Lifeline Structures <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
426<\/td>\n | Protecting Underground Tunnel by Rubber-Soil Mixtures <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
437<\/td>\n | Real-Time Remote Monitoring of Perturbed Force on Pre-Stressed Cable in Rock Slopes <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
449<\/td>\n | Seismic Performance of Large Underground Structures in Unsaturated and Liquefiable Soils <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
461<\/td>\n | Hayward Fault Earthquake\u2014Lifelines Performance Earthquake Lifeline Performance\u2014Municipal Water System in a Mid-Size City <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
468<\/td>\n | Pacific Gas and Electric Natural Gas System Preparations for a Future Hayward Earthquake <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
480<\/td>\n | Performance of PG&E\u2019s Electric Transmission System in a 7M Hayward Earthquake <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
489<\/td>\n | Seismic Safety of Water Lifelines: An Ongoing Process <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
499<\/td>\n | Hurricane Katrina\u2014Lifelines Performance Impact of Hurricane Katrina on Hospital Lifelines <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
510<\/td>\n | Lessons in Bridge Vulnerability from Hurricane Katrina: Reconnaissance Findings and Analysis of Empirical Data <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
520<\/td>\n | Performance of Water and Gas Pipes in Past Earthquakes and Hurricanes <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
529<\/td>\n | South Louisiana River and Coastal Ports: Lessons Learned from Hurricane Katrina <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
541<\/td>\n | Wind Damage to Dockside Cranes: Recent Failures and Recommendations <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
553<\/td>\n | Lifeline Research at MCEER\u2014Earthquake Engineering to Extreme Events Advances in GIS for Lifeline Visualization and Management <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
564<\/td>\n | Estimated Durations of Post-Earthquake Water Service Interruptions in Los Angeles <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
576<\/td>\n | Scenario Response and Restoration of Los Angeles Water System to a Magnitude 7.8 San Andreas Fault Earthquake <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
588<\/td>\n | Social Impacts of Lifeline Losses: Modeling Displaced Populations and Health Care Functionality <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
598<\/td>\n | Lifeline Research at the Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center Development of a Liquefaction Hazard Screening Tool for Caltrans Bridge Sites <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
610<\/td>\n | Overview of Recommended Analysis Procedures for Pile Foundations in Laterally Spreading Ground <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
618<\/td>\n | A Probabilistic Tsunami Hazard Analysis of California <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
630<\/td>\n | Seismic Risk Evaluation for the Baseline PEER Bridge Testbed <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
642<\/td>\n | Transportation System Direct Loss Exceedence Analysis and Subsystem Reliability under Retrofit Action <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
653<\/td>\n | Lifelines Interdependence Inverse Reliability-Based Design of Interdependent Lifeline Systems <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
665<\/td>\n | Interdependence between Power Delivery and Other Lifelines <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
672<\/td>\n | Modeling of Restoration Process Associated with Critical Infrastructure and Its Interdependency Due to a Seismic Disaster <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
684<\/td>\n | Seismic Performance Assessment of Interdependent Utility Network Systems <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
695<\/td>\n | Lifelines Interdependence and Sustainability The Impact of Climate Change on Transportation in the Gulf Coast <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
706<\/td>\n | Reduced Computational Complexity for the Reliability Assessment of Typical Infrastructure Topologies <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
718<\/td>\n | Societal Impacts of Infrastructure Failure Interdependencies: Building an Empirical Knowledge Base <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
728<\/td>\n | Sustainable Infrastructure Subjected to Multiple Threats <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
739<\/td>\n | Multihazard Risk Evaluation: Performance of Lifelines Subjected to Multihazards Blast Protection of Cable-Stayed and Suspension Bridges <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
751<\/td>\n | Fire Protection of Steel Bridges and the Case of the MacArthur Maze Fire Collapse <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
763<\/td>\n | Lifeline Vulnerability to Volcanic Eruption: Learnings from a National Simulation Exercise <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
775<\/td>\n | Role of Computer Simulation in Mitigating Natural Catastrophic Risks <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
784<\/td>\n | Shoreline Protection Evaluation for a Post-Tsunami Highway in Indonesia <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
796<\/td>\n | Pipelines: Pipelines 1 Analytical Fragility Relation for Buried Segmented Pipe <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
806<\/td>\n | New Perspectives on the Damage Estimation for Buried Pipeline Systems Due to Seismic Wave Propagation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
816<\/td>\n | Observed Damage of Wastewater Pipelines and Estimated Manhole Uplifts during the 2004 Niigataken Chuetsu, Japan, Earthquake <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
828<\/td>\n | Wave Propagation Damage to Continuous Pipe <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
836<\/td>\n | Pipelines 2 Compressive Behavior of Steel Pipelines with Welded Slip Joints <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
848<\/td>\n | Pipeline Damage Assessment Using Cluster Analysis <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
856<\/td>\n | Tensile Behavior of Steel Pipelines with Welded Slip Joints <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
867<\/td>\n | Seaports: Seismic Risk Management for Port Systems Analysis and Testing of Container Cranes under Earthquake Loads <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
878<\/td>\n | Fragility Models for Container Cargo Wharves <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
890<\/td>\n | Seismic Performance of Pile-Wharf Connections <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
903<\/td>\n | Seismic Response of Pile-Supported Container Wharves <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
913<\/td>\n | Seismic Risk Analyses for Container Ports <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
925<\/td>\n | Seismic Design Standards and Codes for Ports History of Seismic Design Codes for Piers and Wharves <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
934<\/td>\n | Seismic Design Criteria for Pile-Supported Wharves at the Port of Long Beach <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
944<\/td>\n | Seismic Guidelines for Container Cranes <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
955<\/td>\n | Seismic Soil-Structure Interaction Issues for Pile-Supported Piers and Wharves <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
966<\/td>\n | Panel Discussion on Seismic Risk Issues for U. S. Ports Panel Discussion\u2014Port Engineers on Seismic Risk Issues Related to the Design of Wharves <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
976<\/td>\n | Seismic Rehabilitation for Port Structures and Marine Oil Terminals 1 Lessons Learned for the Seismic Assessment of California Marine Oil Terminals <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
987<\/td>\n | Seismic Screening and Requalification of Marine Oil Terminals in California <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
996<\/td>\n | Seismic Rehabilitation of Timber Structures <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1005<\/td>\n | Seismic Rehabilitation for Port Structures and Marine Oil Terminals 2 A Case Study on the Use of Advanced Fiberwrap Composites for the Seismic Retrofit of Waterfront Structures <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1013<\/td>\n | Effectiveness of Stone Columns on Slope Deformations beneath Wharves <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1025<\/td>\n | Project Specific and System-Wide Considerations for Wharf Retrofit Improvements at the Port of Oakland <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1039<\/td>\n | Seismic Upgrade of Berths 145\u2013147 Container Wharf at the Port of Los Angeles <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1046<\/td>\n | Seismic Response and Instrumentation of Port Facilities A Comparison Study of Engineering Approaches for Seismic Evaluation of Anchored Sheet Pile Walls <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1057<\/td>\n | Performance Evaluation of Pile-Supported Wharf under Seismic Loading <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1067<\/td>\n | Strong Motion Instrumentation of Seismically-Strengthened Port Structures in California by CSMIP <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1076<\/td>\n | Seismic Risk Analysis: Seismic Risk Analysis 1 Deaggregation of Lifeline Risk: Insights for Choosing Deterministic Scenario Earthquakes <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1086<\/td>\n | Independent Technical and Policy-Level Seismic Reviews of Major Lifelines and Critical Facilities in California by the Seismic Safety Commission <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1098<\/td>\n | Numerical Simulation of Nonstationary Earthquake Field Compatible with Prescribed Response Spectrum <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1109<\/td>\n | Using ShakeCast and ShakeMap for Lifeline Post-Earthquake Response and Earthquake Scenario Planning <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1121<\/td>\n | Seismic Risk Analysis 2 A Bayesian Network Framework for Post-Earthquake Infrastructure System Performance Assessment <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1133<\/td>\n | Minimal Path Sets Seismic Reliability Evaluation of Lifeline Networks with Link and Node Failures <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1145<\/td>\n | Multi-Hazard Reliability Analysis of Lifeline Networks <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1153<\/td>\n | Seismic Risk Analysis and Management for an Existing Lifeline System <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1165<\/td>\n | Seismic Risk Analysis 3 Lifeline Resiliency: A Look at Earthquake Risk in Portland, Oregon <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1176<\/td>\n | Lessons Learned from Seismic Collapse Assessment of Buildings for Evaluation of Bridge Structures <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1188<\/td>\n | Rapid Stochastic Assessment of Post-Hazard Connectivity and Flow Capacity of Urban Infrastructure Network <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1200<\/td>\n | Seismic Site Response for an LNG Facility\u2014Analyses and Lessons Learned <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1212<\/td>\n | Transportation: Seismic Performance of Transportation Facilities Proposed Seismic Design Methods for Transportation Culverts and Drainage Structures <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1224<\/td>\n | Retrofitting the Bay Area Rapid Transit District Infrastructure for Earthquakes <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1235<\/td>\n | Upgrading a Lifeline for Seismic Safety through Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering\u2014A Case Study at Anchorage International Airport <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1247<\/td>\n | Vulnerability Assessment of Perimeter Dike System at Oakland International Airport <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1259<\/td>\n | Water and Wastewater: Water and Wastewater Facilities and Systems City of Milpitas Strategic Plan to Protect and Restore Water Utility Service in the Event of a Magnitude 7 Earthquake on the Hayward Fault <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1270<\/td>\n | Emergency Staff Mobilization for Water Supply under Malfunction of Transportation Systems <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1281<\/td>\n | Los Angeles Water Supply Response to 7.8 Mw Earthquake <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1293<\/td>\n | Probabilistic Seismic Damage Assessment for Water Supply Networks following Earthquake <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1304<\/td>\n | Water Treatment Plant Seismic Risk Assessment for the Joint Water Commission, Hillsboro, Oregon <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1314<\/td>\n | Dam and Reservoir Analysis and Safety A New Model Technique for Seismic Analysis of Arch Dams Including Dam-Reservoir Interaction <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1326<\/td>\n | Bolstering Lifeline Resilience through a Comprehensive Dam Safety Program <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1338<\/td>\n | Rancho Bernardo Reservoir Rehabilitation and Seismic Upgrade <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1350<\/td>\n | Seismic Retrofit of Timer Roofs on Open-Cut Reservoirs <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1358<\/td>\n | Seismic Safety Evaluation of Cracked Concrete Gravity Dam <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1367<\/td>\n | Performance of Lifelines during Wenchuan Earthquake: Session 1 Emergency Response and Recovery after the May 12, 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1374<\/td>\n | Performance of Highway Structures during the May 12, 2008 Wenchuan, China Earthquake <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1384<\/td>\n | Wenchuan Earthquake Impact to Power Systems <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1396<\/td>\n | Session 2 Dam Damage: Evaluating and Learning from the Wenchuan Earthquake\u2019s Impact to China\u2019s Dams <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1408<\/td>\n | May 12, 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake\u2014Geoscience Aspect, Earthquake Impact, Response, and Recovery <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1420<\/td>\n | Potable Water System Damage and Recovery from M 8.0 Wenchuan Earthquake, China <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1432<\/td>\n | Telecommunications Performance\u2014May 2008, Wenchuan, Sichuan Earthquake <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1441<\/td>\n | Poster Session 3 Dimensional Damper Element for Reinforced Concrete Frames <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1453<\/td>\n | Assessing the Effectiveness of Blast and Seismic Mitigation Measures in an Integrated Design Context <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1465<\/td>\n | Comparative Study among Conventional and Adaptive Pushover Methods <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1477<\/td>\n | Dynamic Analysis of Structures Including Soil-Structure Interaction Using Ritz Method in Frequency Domain <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1489<\/td>\n | Effect of Through Plate Connection on Transferring Loads in CFT Columns <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1501<\/td>\n | Performance Based Evaluation of Damage Levels for Retrofitting of Structures <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1512<\/td>\n | Seismic Enhancement of Shear Panel Details Are Presented in TI809-07 2006 <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1521<\/td>\n | Seismic Improvement Performance of a New Hybrid Cold-Formed Wall System by Introduction of Special Details <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
1529<\/td>\n | The Behaviour of Tuned Liquid Dampers\u2014Experiment and Analytical Solution <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" TCLEE 2009<\/b><\/p>\n |