None<\/p>\n
| PDF Pages<\/th>\n | PDF Title<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7<\/td>\n | Executive Summary <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 13<\/td>\n | Table of Contents <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 17<\/td>\n | List of Figures <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 19<\/td>\n | List of Tables <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 21<\/td>\n | Introduction 1.1 Congressional Mandate <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 22<\/td>\n | 1.2 Approach 1.3 Report Organization and Content <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 25<\/td>\n | 1.4 Motivation for Change <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 29<\/td>\n | 1.5 Community Resilience <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 30<\/td>\n | 1.6 Reoccupancy and Functional Recovery <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 32<\/td>\n | 1.6.1 Reoccupancy Defined 1.6.2 Functional Recovery Defined <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 33<\/td>\n | 1.6.3 Description of a Target Recovery-Based Performance State <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 34<\/td>\n | 1.7 Advancement in Design Capabilities <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 37<\/td>\n | 1.8 Costs and Benefits 1.8.1 Costs of Action <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 38<\/td>\n | 1.8.2 Benefits of Action <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 41<\/td>\n | Framework for Reoccupancy and Functional Recovery RECOMMENDATION 1: Develop a Framework for Post-Earthquake Reoccupancy and Functional Recovery Objectives <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 42<\/td>\n | Task 1.1: Develop a Policy for Recovery-Based Objectives <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 43<\/td>\n | Task 1.2: Develop Design Criteria for Achieving Recovery-Based Objectives <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 44<\/td>\n | Task 1.3: Determine Appropriate Hazard Levels for Recovery-Based Objectives <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 47<\/td>\n | Improve the Performance of Buildings <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 48<\/td>\n | RECOMMENDATION 2: Design New Buildings to Meet Recovery-Based Objectives <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 50<\/td>\n | Alternative 2-1: Mandate the Design of New Buildings to Meet Recovery-Based Objectives Using Future National Model Code Provisions Alternative 2-2: Mandate the Design of New Buildings to Meet Recovery-Based Objectives Using Interim Provisions Alternative 2-3: Encourage the Voluntary Design of New Buildings to Meet Recovery-Based Objectives RECOMMENDATION 3: Retrofit Existing Buildings to Meet Recovery-Based Objectives <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 53<\/td>\n | Alternative 3-1: Mandate the Retrofit of Existing Buildings to Meet Recovery-Based Objectives <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 54<\/td>\n | Alternative 3-2: Trigger the Retrofit of Existing Buildings to Meet Recovery-Based Objectives <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 55<\/td>\n | Alternative 3-3: Encourage the Voluntary Retrofit of Existing Buildings to Meet Recovery-Based Objectives <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 57<\/td>\n | Improve the Performance of Lifeline Infrastructure Systems <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 59<\/td>\n | RECOMMENDATION 4: Design, Upgrade, and Maintain Lifeline Infrastructure Systems to Meet Recovery-Based Objectives <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 61<\/td>\n | Task 4.1: Provide National Guidance on Regulatory Authority Across Lifeline Infrastructure Sectors Task 4.2: Evaluate the Ability of Lifeline Infrastructure Systems to Meet Recovery-Based Objectives <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 62<\/td>\n | Task 4.3: Develop National Seismic Design Standards to Meet Recovery-Based Objectives for Lifeline Infrastructure Systems <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 64<\/td>\n | Task 4.4: Create Regional Lifelines Councils <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 65<\/td>\n | Alternative 4-1: Mandate the Design of New and Upgrade of Existing Lifeline Infrastructure Systems to Meet Recovery-Based Objectives Alternative 4-2: Encourage the Voluntary Design of New and Upgrade of Existing Lifeline Infrastructure Systems to Meet Recovery-Based Objectives <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 66<\/td>\n | Alternative 4-3: Trigger the Upgrade of Existing Lifeline Infrastructure Systems to Meet Recovery-Based Objectives <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 67<\/td>\n | Expedite Recovery through Pre-Disaster Planning and Implementation <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 68<\/td>\n | RECOMMENDATION 5: Develop and Implement Pre-Disaster Recovery Planning Focused on Recovery-Based Objectives Task 5.1: Develop and Implement Pre-Disaster Recovery Plans <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 70<\/td>\n | Task 5.2: Create and Promote Seismic Continuity Programs <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 71<\/td>\n | Task 5.3: Expand and Improve Criteria, Guidelines, and Procedures for Post-Earthquake Assessments and Evaluations <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 73<\/td>\n | Task 5.4: Plan for Sufficient Staffing to Expedite Post-Earthquake Recovery <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 74<\/td>\n | Task 5.5: Develop and Implement Building Occupancy Resumption Programs <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 75<\/td>\n | Task 5.6: Develop Alternative Standards for Temporary Habitability to Facilitate Reoccupancy <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 77<\/td>\n | Enable Action with Education and Financial Resources RECOMMENDATION 6: Provide Education and Outreach to Enhance Awareness and Understanding of Earthquake Risk and Recovery-Based Objectives <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 78<\/td>\n | Task 6.1: Educate Building and Lifeline Infrastructure System Stakeholders about Earthquake Risk and Recovery-Based Objectives <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 79<\/td>\n | Task 6.2: Educate Design and Construction Industry Professionals about Earthquake Risk and Recovery-Based Objectives <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 80<\/td>\n | RECOMMENDATION 7: Facilitate Access to Financial Resources Needed to Achieve Recovery-Based Objectives <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 81<\/td>\n | Task 7.1: Develop and Deploy Pre-Disaster Financial Mechanisms to Achieve Recovery-Based Objectives <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 83<\/td>\n | Task 7.2: Develop and Deploy Post-Disaster Financial Mechanisms to Achieve Recovery-Based Objectives <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 87<\/td>\n | Assessment and Conclusions 7.1 Qualitative Assessment of Recommendations and Alternatives <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 90<\/td>\n | 7.2 Stakeholder Roles <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 92<\/td>\n | 7.3 A Path Forward <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 94<\/td>\n | 7.4 Conclusions <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 97<\/td>\n | Process and Approach A.1 Committee of Experts <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 98<\/td>\n | A.2 Stakeholder Workshops A.2.1 Workshop Participants <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 99<\/td>\n | A.2.2 Workshop Objectives <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 100<\/td>\n | A.2.3 Workshop Agenda A.2.4 Breakout Session 1: Functional Recovery Framework A.2.5 Breakout Sessions 2 and 3: Assessing and Evaluating Options <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 102<\/td>\n | A.2.6 Workshop Takeaways <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 105<\/td>\n | Supplemental Information on a Framework for Reoccupancy and Functional Recovery B.1 Conceptual Illustration of Recovery Categories <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 106<\/td>\n | B.2 Damage Descriptions for Buildings and Lifeline Infrastructure Systems Meeting Different Target Functional Recovery Times <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 109<\/td>\n | Supplemental Information on Lifeline Infrastructure Systems C.1 Summary of Topics Identified in the NEHRP Lifelines Roadmap <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 111<\/td>\n | C.2 Possible Tasks for a New National Lifelines Organization <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 113<\/td>\n | Supplemental Information on Pre-Disaster Planning and Implementation D.1 Examples of Seismic Continuity Programs <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 114<\/td>\n | D.2 Examples of Assessment and Evaluation Guidelines <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 115<\/td>\n | D.3 Seismic Instrumentation and Other Smart Technologies <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 116<\/td>\n | D.4 Examples of Building Occupancy Resumption Programs and Other Similar Programs <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 119<\/td>\n | References <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 131<\/td>\n | Participants <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 136<\/td>\n | Blank Page <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n | ||||||
| 137<\/td>\n | Blank Page <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" FEMA P-2090: Recommended Options for Improving the Built Environment for Post-Earthquake Reoccupancy and Functional Recovery Time<\/b><\/p>\n |